A Reflection on Humility, Perception, and the Prophetic Challenge of the Independent Sacramental Movement

​

I. The Scandal of Appearances

Among the curiosities of modern Christianity, the Independent Sacramental Movement (ISM) stands out as one of the most misunderstood — and at times, one of the most misrepresented — expressions of Christian life. To many observers, it is a punchline: an odd collection of self-styled “patriarchs,” “archbishops,” and “metropolitans” who preside over minuscule flocks, wear ornate vestments, and issue grand proclamations that no one outside their circle will ever read. “No respectable person goes there,” we are told.

​

And yet, history is filled with similar dismissals. The early Anabaptists were mocked as fanatics. The Franciscans were derided as beggars unfit for serious theology. The first Methodists were ridiculed for their “methods” of holiness. Every reforming or renewing movement in the Church’s history has at some point appeared as a scandal or an embarrassment — until time revealed the deeper work of the Spirit beneath the surface oddities.

​

The ISM, to be sure, gives its critics plenty of ammunition. One need only browse social media or websites of various jurisdictions to encounter a bewildering array of titles: “Patriarch of All the Americas,” “Archbishop of the Northern Hemisphere,” “Supreme Primate of the Apostolic See of St. John.” Some claim orders from lines of succession so tangled that they would make a genealogist faint. The casual observer shakes their head, seeing only vanity, self-importance, and parody.

​

But to stop there is to miss the deeper question: What does the phenomenon of the ISM reveal about the hunger and the wounds of contemporary Christianity? Why do so many find themselves outside the traditional churches, yet unable to let go of the sacraments, the priesthood, or the visible signs of grace? To dismiss the ISM as absurd is easy. To listen to its longing is harder.

​

II. Between Farce and Prophecy

The ISM lives in a strange space between farce and prophecy. On the one hand, it contains undeniable absurdities: inflated egos, fragmented jurisdictions, endless schisms, and the pursuit of dignity through costume rather than character. On the other hand, it also contains a quiet and genuine witness — a yearning for the sacred in a world where institutional churches have often failed to embody holiness, compassion, or accountability.

​

It is tempting to laugh at bishops with five followers, or at “orders” conferred in living rooms. Yet, before we laugh too loudly, perhaps we should recall how easily the same sins of pride, clericalism, and hypocrisy infect the largest and most “respectable” churches. The difference is often only one of scale. Pride wears many vestments — sometimes silk and gold, sometimes a tailored Roman collar.

​

In a video by the YouTuber Qxir about Zambia’s brief “space program” of the 1960s, the central figure, Edward Mukuka Nkoloso, is shown leading young Zambians through mock astronaut training. To the world, it looked ridiculous — a parody of modern progress. Yet some historians later asked: was it satire? Was Nkoloso holding a mirror to colonial arrogance, mocking the Western pretensions that Africans were “backward”? Was the joke, in fact, on those who laughed?

​

Perhaps something similar can be said of the ISM. Perhaps part of its unintentional genius is that it reveals the ridiculousness of ecclesial pomp itself. When tiny churches declare themselves patriarchates, we see in miniature the same absurdity that often hides beneath centuries of institutional prestige. The ISM holds up a distorted mirror to the rest of Christendom — and the reflection is not flattering.

​

III. A Mirror to the Mainstream Church

For those who look down on the ISM with disdain, it is worth asking: What exactly are you mocking? Is it the desire for dignity among the marginalized? The persistence of sacramental life outside of control? Or the embarrassing reminder that even your own traditions once began as small, disreputable gatherings of idealists and outcasts?

​

Every great reform in Christian history has emerged from the margins. The early Franciscans were barefoot radicals who frightened bishops. The Anabaptists were executed as heretics. The early Catholics of the catacombs had no cathedrals, no vestments, and no papal courts. When those on the margins begin to reclaim the language of sacrament and apostolic order, it unsettles those who believe they alone hold legitimacy.

​

The ISM’s weakness — its fragmentation, its vanity, its lack of structure — is also its mirror to the institutional churches. The movement reveals what happens when apostolic order is imitated without formation, when authority is assumed without accountability, when liturgical beauty is separated from moral integrity. But this is not unique to independents. It is merely more visible because the ISM cannot hide behind wealth, bureaucracy, or centuries of cultural prestige.

​

What we see in miniature among independents exists in macro form within the historic communions: pride, division, infighting, abuse, and the endless multiplication of titles and honors. The ISM simply exposes the disease that afflicts all of us in one way or another — the human desire to appear holy rather than to become holy.

​

IV. The Tragedy of Titles

Jesus’ warning could not be clearer: “They love the places of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues, and to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces, and to be called rabbi by others.” (Matthew 23:6–7). How easily those words apply to every age, every church, and every clerical culture.

​

The tragedy of the ISM’s obsession with titles is not merely that it looks foolish. It is that it reveals how deeply we have misunderstood what apostolic succession means. True succession is not a chain of hands but a continuity of hearts — a participation in the apostolic witness to Christ crucified and risen. Without holiness, humility, and service, episcopal lineage becomes little more than ecclesiastical cosplay.

​

When a man or woman styles themselves as “Patriarch of the Western Hemisphere” while pastoring a congregation of three, we might smile — but we should also weep. For beneath that inflation lies a spiritual hunger, a wound, a desire to belong to something enduring. Many in the ISM came from traditions that rejected them, ignored them, or silenced their vocation. They sought validation and found only fragmentation. Titles became a substitute for community, regalia a substitute for reverence.

​

The solution is not mockery, but formation. What the ISM needs is not more vestments, but more virtue; not more offices, but more obedience; not more titles, but more theology.

​

V. A Call to Reform from Within

If the ISM is ever to become a credible witness to Christ, it must begin with repentance — not merely for individual sins, but for structural vanity. The reform must begin at the top, with those who call themselves bishops. If a bishop has no flock, he must ask whether his vocation is to preside or to serve. If he claims to guard the faith, he must study it. If he calls himself a successor to the apostles, he must live apostolically — poor, prayerful, and self-giving.

​

The Independent Sacramental Movement must reclaim the meaning of its independence. Independence is not rebellion; it is responsibility. To be independent of Rome, Canterbury, or Constantinople is not to be independent of truth, tradition, or accountability. It means being free to live the Gospel more faithfully, not to indulge in fantasies of grandeur.

​

If we, who labor in the ISM, want to be taken seriously, we must take Christ seriously. We must form clergy who know Scripture, theology, and pastoral care. We must establish transparent governance and discipline. We must ordain fewer bishops and make more disciples. We must move from vanity to vocation, from titles to testimony, from hierarchy to holiness.

​

VI. A Word to the Outsiders

But to those who stand outside the ISM and look down upon it with contempt, another word is needed. Be careful whom you mock. The Spirit has a way of working through the weak and foolish things of the world to shame the wise. (1 Corinthians 1:27). If the ISM is a farce, it is also a parable — a living critique of a church that has grown too comfortable, too institutional, too unwilling to let go of control.

​

For every self-proclaimed patriarch with delusions of grandeur, there are quiet, faithful independents who celebrate the Eucharist for the lonely, baptize the forgotten, and anoint the dying in hospital rooms where no one else will go. These are the true saints of the ISM — men and women of prayer, often unrecognized, who keep the sacraments alive on the margins. Their ministry is not ridiculous; it is radiant.

​

The mainstream churches would do well to ask why so many find themselves outside their walls. Why have so many priests, deacons, and faithful felt the need to leave? Why have so many wounded souls found in the ISM a place of healing when they could not find it in the “respectable” churches? The failures that created the ISM are not the ISM’s alone.

​

VII. The Prophetic Task Ahead

The challenge before us, then, is not to abolish the ISM but to redeem it — to strip away its pretensions and reveal its prophetic core. Beneath the clutter of titles and jurisdictions lies a radical truth: the Church does not belong to emperors, popes, or corporations. The Church belongs to Christ, and wherever the sacraments are celebrated in faith and charity, there the Church is present.

​

The future of the ISM will depend on whether it can embody that truth. Can we become a movement marked not by hierarchy but by holiness? Can we build communities of formation, accountability, and mission? Can we model a servant episcopate that leads by washing feet rather than claiming thrones? Can we demonstrate that validity and charity must walk together — that a valid sacrament without love is as hollow as a title without service?

To our own shame, we have often failed. But failure is not the final word. The very absurdity of our situation may yet become the seed of renewal, if we are humble enough to learn.

​

VIII. Conclusion: From Ridicule to Revelation

“Patriarchs, Archbishops, and other Ridiculous Titles in the ISM — Oh My!” Yes, there is plenty to laugh at. But laughter, if it leads to humility, can become a kind of grace. Perhaps God allows the ISM to exist — in all its chaos and comedy — as a living reminder that no church, no title, and no institution is immune to folly.

​

If the ISM can learn to laugh at itself, to repent of its pride, and to rediscover the Gospel of humility, it may yet become what it was always meant to be: a prophetic sign that God still calls from the margins. The question is whether we will listen — or whether we will, like those before us, repeat the same sins of pride and blindness that we so easily condemn in others.

​

May the Lord who humbled Himself to wash the feet of His disciples teach us again the meaning of true greatness. And may the Independent Sacramental Movement, in all its fragility and foolishness, become not a parody of the Church, but a parable of grace.